Cart
Your shopping cart is empty!
It's never too late to make things right :)
Chillers and HRVF (Heat Recovery VRF) are two distinct approaches to air conditioning and heating in commercial, industrial, and residential buildings. Let’s break down their key differences.
Feature | Chiller | HRVF (Heat Recovery VRF) |
---|---|---|
Cooling Medium | Water or glycol | Refrigerant (freon) |
Heat Transfer | Chilled liquid circulates through pipes to fan coils | Refrigerant is distributed directly to indoor units |
Heating & Cooling | Water is cooled in one unit and heated in another | Simultaneous heating and cooling possible |
System Flexibility | Limited, requires complex piping | Highly flexible and scalable |
Temperature Control | Centralized temperature control | Individual temperature control per room |
Building Type | Chiller | HRVF (Heat Recovery VRF) |
---|---|---|
Shopping Malls | ✅ Yes, well-suited | ❌ Less efficient |
Office Buildings | ✅ Possible but complex | ✅ Excellent choice |
Residential Complexes | ❌ No, too complex and costly | ✅ Good solution |
Factories & Industrial | ✅ Yes, powerful cooling | ❌ Less effective |
Hotels & Hospitality | ✅ Can work, but expensive piping | ✅ Great choice, independent room control |
Factor | Chiller | HRVF (Heat Recovery VRF) |
---|---|---|
Energy Consumption | Higher for large loads | Very efficient, especially with heat recovery |
Installation Cost | High (complex piping systems) | Medium (simpler than chillers) |
Maintenance | Requires frequent servicing (pumps, pipes, liquid) | Lower maintenance but needs refrigerant pressure control |
Temperature Regulation | Limited flexibility | High flexibility, individual room control |
Feature | Chiller | HRVF (Heat Recovery VRF) |
---|---|---|
Lifespan | 15-25 years | 10-20 years |
Installation Complexity | Requires extensive infrastructure | Easier than chillers but more expensive than standard VRF |
System Scalability | Limited, requires large installation space | Highly flexible and easy to expand |